The Arizona Republic writes (subscription required) that Proposition 139, if passed, could significantly alter nearly 40 abortion-related laws in Arizona, a move that opponents argue would jeopardize the health and safety of women and girls. The measure, which seeks to create a constitutional right to abortion in Arizona, threatens to undo critical regulations that currently protect patients. Stacey Barchenger writes:
“We have very basic commonsense safety precautions that are there to protect girls and women,” Cindy Dahlgren, a spokesperson for the opposition campaign, It Goes Too Far, said in an interview.
Opponents of Proposition 139 have highlighted specific concerns, such as the potential overturning of parental consent laws and the removal of the ultrasound requirement before an abortion. They argue that these measures are essential for detecting complications and ensuring minors have parental guidance. Even Andy Gaona, an attorney for the ballot measure campaign, admits this. Barchenger states:
Gaona identified a few additional laws as likely targets that wouldn’t meet the standard established by the amendment. He said those include:
Require an ultrasound before a surgical abortion or abortion pills are provided
Ban telehealth for abortion services
Prohibit mailing of abortion pills
Dahlgren also warns that the vague language in the amendment could lead to unregulated abortion practices. Barchenger continues:
“In a press conference hosted by It Goes Too Far, opponents said the amendment could nullify a law that requires a licensed physician to provide abortions… ‘This is a vague, undefined term,’ said Dr. Erica Kreller… ‘In Arizona, it includes dentists, veterinarians, athletic trainers, school nurses and medical assistants at abortion facilities.’”
Critics of the dangerous amendment argue that the risks of repealing laws designed to protect patient safety far outweigh any benefits of expanded access.
Read the full story here. (Subscription Required)