The Arizona Republic reports (subscription required) that the campaign behind Proposition 139, the Arizona Abortion Access Act, has refused to participate in state-mandated public forums. Despite being offered the opportunity to present their case alongside opponents, Arizona for Abortion Access has declined. This has sparked criticism from groups opposed to Proposition 139, such as Arizona Right to Life, who believe the campaign is avoiding scrutiny. Stacey Barchenger of the Arizona Republic states:
“Why? Why won’t they debate us?” asked Jill Norgaard of Arizona Right to Life, an anti-abortion group. “I have my theory, and it’s that they don’t want to tell the truth. They don’t want to tell the truth about Proposition 139.”
Opponents of Prop 139 say the amendment would allow unregulated abortion in the state, and would greatly increase the risk to women who seek abortions. They say the current law, which allows abortion up to 15 weeks is sufficient, and not a ban on abortion as proponents claim.
By skipping public forums, Arizona for Abortion Access leaves the opposition’s arguments unchallenged, yet critics argue their refusal to engage speaks volumes. Opponents of the measure rightfully point out that it would dangerously expand access to abortion, legalizing late-term abortions disguised under vague “mental health” exceptions. Barchenger adds:
(Cindy) Dahlgren (of It Goes Too Far) charged in the Friday news conference that proponents “disrespect voters when they lie about their proposition and they lie about Arizona law.”
The Arizona Abortion Access campaign’s unwillingness to debate and provide answers raises critical questions about their intentions and the dangerous implications of Proposition 139.
Read the full story here. (Subscription Required)